Barack Obama: Obama opposed the War in Iraq since day one. Back in 2002 he warned of “an occupation of undetermined length, with undetermined costs, and undetermined consequences.” Obama intends to remove troops from Iraq immediately. Every month he will remove either one or two brigades. Within 16 months Obama plans to have all of the combat brigades out of Iraq. Nevertheless, he will keep some troops in Iraq to protect the US embassy and diplomats.
Hilary Clinton: Even though Hillary mistakenly voted yes to the war in Iraq, she too wants to end US military interference in Iraq’s civil war. She plans to bring our troops home. In her first 60 days of office Hillary Clinton plans to convene the Joint Chiefs of Staff, her National Security Council, and her Secretary of Defense in efforts of directing them in conducting a feasible plan to bring the troops home. She also intends to direct the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs to prepare an inclusive plan to provide the best health care and benefits to every service member.
John McCain: McCain on the other hand doesn’t mind if US troops stay in Iraq for another 100 years. One of McCain’s first goals is to build an Iraqi army because he thinks that will ensure Iraq’s ability to govern properly. McCain wants these troops to play a key role in keeping Iraq secure. He does not want to withdraw US troops until Iraq is stabilized. McCain believe that a withdrawal of US troops from Iraq would merely condemn Iraq to civil war.
I think Barack Obama’s proposal was the strongest solution oriented one because it’s the most pragmatic, and you can tell by his devotion, perseverance, and speech that he truly wants to make a change. Barack beautifully states that “we will come together because we believe that in the face of war there can be peace. In the face of despair we believe there can be hope. And in the face of a politics that’s shut us out, told us to settle, that’s divided us for too long, we believe we can be one people reaching for what’s possible.”
A fallacy that I came across was how Hillary Clinton continues to say “I oppose the Iraq war” when in reality she voted yes to the war! She keeps using the excuse “I trusted Bush to be responsible but he abused the trust”. I can not say anything negative about Barack Obama. Every word that he utters is golden. Every notion that he engenders is sheer ingenious. McCain’s remark about the Iraq war saying he will keep the troops in Iraq for 100 years more if he has to was uncalled for. He gave off the impression that he was abusing his authority with such remarks.
First first question goes to Barack Obama: Do you have a back up plan if your plan to withdraw US troops from Iraq within the first 16 months of your presidency fails?
Second question goes to Hillary Clinton: Why do you keep saying that you bring “experience” to the table and belittle Obama by saying he brings “speeches”?
I joined the facebook group “One Million Strong for Obama” a year ago after Senator Barack Obama’s first visit to George Mason University. Since then, I consider myself an “Obama advocator”. This group keeps us up to date with Obama’s campaign events and we learn more about his movement for change. You too can join this group; it is only a click away.
Michelle’s discussed the big issue of health care. She pointed out that Hillary and Barack have relatively similar approaches to withdraw US troops from Iraq. McCain wants the patients themselves to be able to make decisions and carry on more responsibility. Michelle introduced the GMU College Republicans or Democrats groups that provide many opportunities for persons to take action.
Noor discussed the Iraq war. She seems to be so passionate about this topic and deliberated it exceptionally. She explained how Obama wants to withdraw US troops from Iraq immediately but not completely.
Wednesday, April 9, 2008
Wednesday, April 2, 2008
To Pirate or not to Pirate? That is the quesiton!
Hassanah El-Yacoubi: Hello everyone! And thank you for tuning in today. Our guests for the day are Jason Shultz and Scott Mathews disputing such a controversial issue on file-sharing ,illegal downloading, and the “steeling” of unauthorized files such as music downloads and/or videos. People who download music illegally without paying for it or acquiring legitimate authorization do not know that they are being watched and could potentially be sued for piracy. Let talk to our guests about this and see what they have to say. Scott, how did file-sharing stir up such a controversy over something we seem to think so little”?
Scott Matthews: Hassanah, thank you for having me. Let’s get right to it. It is simply against the law to pirate. And those who will disobey shall be punished whether they are college students or adults. What these people are failing to see and acknowledge is the fact that these recording companies and producers are working extremely hard at what they do. In the end the amount of income they should be obtaining is virtually cut in half do to illegal downloading and file sharing. Do you think that is fair?
Hassanah El-yacoubi: No not at all, but I myself never knew the severity of this issue. Jason how can you argue this?
Jason Shultz: Hassanah, I’m sorry but no matter what Scott says about “punishing those who disobey the law” pirating is something that will continue to reign until the end of time. It is literally impossible to track down the thousands of people who file share and download illegally. Although I do agree that it is not fair to record companies because some computer wiz has found a way to sell them short of their efforts. That is why I propose a comprehensive license that allows people to attain music and movies from many different sources. As for students they are poor enough. They do not need superfluous charges held against them and unnecessary law suits to add the pile of bills that they are already paying for. It just isn’t right.
Scott Matthews: You see Jason that’s what you do not understand. Even if they are students, that doesn’t make them indifferent to abiding by the law. These students or who ever are doing the crime and therefore they must do time. File sharing and illegal downloading can result in up to $250,000 in fees and 5 years in jail. This is how serious it is. I suggest these students look at the RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) website to fully broaden their understanding of what constitutes piracy and finding other ways around it.
Hassanah El-Yacoubi: Well, now we have a better understanding of file-sharing and I’m sure we will think twice next time we download music illegally. That’s all the time we have today folks. I’d like to thank our esteemed guests for being with us today Jason Shultz and Scott Matthews. See Ya!
Scott Matthews: Hassanah, thank you for having me. Let’s get right to it. It is simply against the law to pirate. And those who will disobey shall be punished whether they are college students or adults. What these people are failing to see and acknowledge is the fact that these recording companies and producers are working extremely hard at what they do. In the end the amount of income they should be obtaining is virtually cut in half do to illegal downloading and file sharing. Do you think that is fair?
Hassanah El-yacoubi: No not at all, but I myself never knew the severity of this issue. Jason how can you argue this?
Jason Shultz: Hassanah, I’m sorry but no matter what Scott says about “punishing those who disobey the law” pirating is something that will continue to reign until the end of time. It is literally impossible to track down the thousands of people who file share and download illegally. Although I do agree that it is not fair to record companies because some computer wiz has found a way to sell them short of their efforts. That is why I propose a comprehensive license that allows people to attain music and movies from many different sources. As for students they are poor enough. They do not need superfluous charges held against them and unnecessary law suits to add the pile of bills that they are already paying for. It just isn’t right.
Scott Matthews: You see Jason that’s what you do not understand. Even if they are students, that doesn’t make them indifferent to abiding by the law. These students or who ever are doing the crime and therefore they must do time. File sharing and illegal downloading can result in up to $250,000 in fees and 5 years in jail. This is how serious it is. I suggest these students look at the RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) website to fully broaden their understanding of what constitutes piracy and finding other ways around it.
Hassanah El-Yacoubi: Well, now we have a better understanding of file-sharing and I’m sure we will think twice next time we download music illegally. That’s all the time we have today folks. I’d like to thank our esteemed guests for being with us today Jason Shultz and Scott Matthews. See Ya!
Thursday, March 27, 2008
This is the Real Deal
1)What is your opinion on concealed weapons being allowed on college campuses? Would you mind if students in your class were carrying guns? How do your personal background and beliefs influence your answer
I think that that allowing concealed weapons on college campuses has its pros and cons. I can not say that allowing students to have concealed weapons on campus would be a horrible idea because it could in fact be beneficial to a certain extent. If something severe were to ever occur at a college campus such as the tragic Virginia Tech massacre, the student or students would be more prepared in this kind of scenario. These students/faculty could potentially decrease the amount of victims that do get injured by using their weapons at the appropriate times. Although, I must admit that I wouldn’t feel so comfortable with having my fellow classmates carry guns around. Even though I am an indigenous American my father was from Palestine. In Palestine there is not a single soul that doesn’t carry concealed weapons on them, and that is why you never know what you could encounter. It is a scary feeling of everlasting fear and apprehension that I’d like to avoid if I can.
2) If guns were allowed on the George Mason campus, what criteria would you want met before the student would be allowed to carry a gun?
I would want an extensive background check on everyone. Anyone who has been convicted of a felony or has a record of misdemeanor should not be permitted to carry a concealed weapon and not even allowed to apply for one. I think anyone responsible college student with a clean record should be eligible to “apply” for a weapon.
3. Using the materials I have provided, what are the strongest arguments in favor of concealed carry weapons on campus? The weakest? Cite specific examples.
I think the strongest argument in favor of concealed carry weapons on campus is David Seelly’s testimony. David graduated from University of Utah and use to carry a concealed weapon on him. He said: "And not just shootings, but [serial killer] Ted Bundy did some of his crimes at the University of Utah campus". (Utah Students Hide Guns, Head to Class). This shows the fear that these students are living in. It also demonstrates how these students have no means of protecting themselves and it frightens them.
The weakest argument in favor of concealed carry weapons on campus would be Casey Matheny’s statement, "I would just keep [them] in my car for target shooting." (Utah Students Hide Guns, Head to Class). If Casey keeps his guns in his car what good would that do in protecting him or his classmates? He would never have the time to run out of class and quickly go to his car and get his gun if somebody bombarded his classroom. By that time God knows how many students would have been dead already. It doesn’t make sense to keep the gun in the car. Either you have it on you at all times so you can be prepared for worst case scenarios or you don’t carry one at all.
4. What are the strongest arguments in favor of prohibiting concealed carry weapons on campus? The weakest? Cite specific examples from your own research.
The strongest argument in favor of prohibiting concealed carry weapons on campus in my opinion is one of the students testimony. She says: “"I feel less safe knowing that a stranger sitting beside me in class may have a gun in his or her backpack” (Utah Students Hide Guns, Head to Class). This shows that students are going to live in fear no matter what the case is. If they get to carry concealed weapons on campus they are still scared of what others will do. If they don’t have any means of protecting themselves they are still scared.
The weakest argument in favor of prohibiting concealed carry weapons on campus in my opinion would have to be Amanda Covington statement, “We are worried that it may affect their [students' and teachers'] willingness or desire to go to or teach a class on campus," (Utah Students Hide Guns, Head to Class). Although Amanda makes a valid point I think she fails to look at the bigger picture. These teachers are getting paid to teach, and these students are paying to come to school. Whether you decide to show up or not, that is not going to prevent a maniac from putting every student at gun point.
5. Should teachers be allowed to carry, but not students? Why or why not?
No, students and teachers should be allowed. What would happen if the shooter just happened to attack a class right after the teacher stepped out to get a drink or use the bathroom? That is not fair. Everyone should have the right to depend and protect themselves in all cases.6. Do some research on the Second Amendment. What are the predominant interpretations of it? In your answer, note whose interpretation you are referencing (for example, did the interpretation appear on the National Rifle Association website?).
The Second Amendment ambiguously states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (answers.com). These words have struck substantial controversy concerning the ongoing debate over gun control. Some say that the amendment was meant to protect the rights of states to maintain militia units. Other opponents say that it was intended to protect an individual right. This is the interpretation from answers.com.
7. In making the decision about whether to allow concealed carry weapons on campus, what factors other than the Second Amendment need to be considered? Or, is the Second Amendment sufficient reason to allow students to carry concealed weapons?
Since the Second Amendment tends to be ambiguous in the sense that many people interpret it in their own ways, I think that there she be a “friendly amendment” attached to the Second Amendment clarifying that every individual is entitled to defend themselves at all places and at all times. This way we can put a stop to all the different interpretations and we can stop running into trouble.
I think that that allowing concealed weapons on college campuses has its pros and cons. I can not say that allowing students to have concealed weapons on campus would be a horrible idea because it could in fact be beneficial to a certain extent. If something severe were to ever occur at a college campus such as the tragic Virginia Tech massacre, the student or students would be more prepared in this kind of scenario. These students/faculty could potentially decrease the amount of victims that do get injured by using their weapons at the appropriate times. Although, I must admit that I wouldn’t feel so comfortable with having my fellow classmates carry guns around. Even though I am an indigenous American my father was from Palestine. In Palestine there is not a single soul that doesn’t carry concealed weapons on them, and that is why you never know what you could encounter. It is a scary feeling of everlasting fear and apprehension that I’d like to avoid if I can.
2) If guns were allowed on the George Mason campus, what criteria would you want met before the student would be allowed to carry a gun?
I would want an extensive background check on everyone. Anyone who has been convicted of a felony or has a record of misdemeanor should not be permitted to carry a concealed weapon and not even allowed to apply for one. I think anyone responsible college student with a clean record should be eligible to “apply” for a weapon.
3. Using the materials I have provided, what are the strongest arguments in favor of concealed carry weapons on campus? The weakest? Cite specific examples.
I think the strongest argument in favor of concealed carry weapons on campus is David Seelly’s testimony. David graduated from University of Utah and use to carry a concealed weapon on him. He said: "And not just shootings, but [serial killer] Ted Bundy did some of his crimes at the University of Utah campus". (Utah Students Hide Guns, Head to Class). This shows the fear that these students are living in. It also demonstrates how these students have no means of protecting themselves and it frightens them.
The weakest argument in favor of concealed carry weapons on campus would be Casey Matheny’s statement, "I would just keep [them] in my car for target shooting." (Utah Students Hide Guns, Head to Class). If Casey keeps his guns in his car what good would that do in protecting him or his classmates? He would never have the time to run out of class and quickly go to his car and get his gun if somebody bombarded his classroom. By that time God knows how many students would have been dead already. It doesn’t make sense to keep the gun in the car. Either you have it on you at all times so you can be prepared for worst case scenarios or you don’t carry one at all.
4. What are the strongest arguments in favor of prohibiting concealed carry weapons on campus? The weakest? Cite specific examples from your own research.
The strongest argument in favor of prohibiting concealed carry weapons on campus in my opinion is one of the students testimony. She says: “"I feel less safe knowing that a stranger sitting beside me in class may have a gun in his or her backpack” (Utah Students Hide Guns, Head to Class). This shows that students are going to live in fear no matter what the case is. If they get to carry concealed weapons on campus they are still scared of what others will do. If they don’t have any means of protecting themselves they are still scared.
The weakest argument in favor of prohibiting concealed carry weapons on campus in my opinion would have to be Amanda Covington statement, “We are worried that it may affect their [students' and teachers'] willingness or desire to go to or teach a class on campus," (Utah Students Hide Guns, Head to Class). Although Amanda makes a valid point I think she fails to look at the bigger picture. These teachers are getting paid to teach, and these students are paying to come to school. Whether you decide to show up or not, that is not going to prevent a maniac from putting every student at gun point.
5. Should teachers be allowed to carry, but not students? Why or why not?
No, students and teachers should be allowed. What would happen if the shooter just happened to attack a class right after the teacher stepped out to get a drink or use the bathroom? That is not fair. Everyone should have the right to depend and protect themselves in all cases.6. Do some research on the Second Amendment. What are the predominant interpretations of it? In your answer, note whose interpretation you are referencing (for example, did the interpretation appear on the National Rifle Association website?).
The Second Amendment ambiguously states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (answers.com). These words have struck substantial controversy concerning the ongoing debate over gun control. Some say that the amendment was meant to protect the rights of states to maintain militia units. Other opponents say that it was intended to protect an individual right. This is the interpretation from answers.com.
7. In making the decision about whether to allow concealed carry weapons on campus, what factors other than the Second Amendment need to be considered? Or, is the Second Amendment sufficient reason to allow students to carry concealed weapons?
Since the Second Amendment tends to be ambiguous in the sense that many people interpret it in their own ways, I think that there she be a “friendly amendment” attached to the Second Amendment clarifying that every individual is entitled to defend themselves at all places and at all times. This way we can put a stop to all the different interpretations and we can stop running into trouble.
Thursday, March 20, 2008
My Time To Shine
Song title: “You are Not Alone There’s a Way Out”
Genre: Country
Explanation: This song elaborates on the obesity epidemic in our nation. The song comforts overweight people using phrases like “you are not alone” and “there is a way out.” The country tone of it will give the listeners a compassionate view on this topic and hopefully prevent bashers from being so cruel. The song will embed in listeners that there is a way out as long as you try to help yourself first.
Song title: “Quit it Before it Quits You”
Genre: Metal Rock
Explanation: This song emphasizes the importance of giving up smoking. The loud instruments and heavy metal echo will make this topic all the more serious. With rhetoric like “quit it before it quits you” I am trying to get the message across that if you do not quit smoking now, you will become awfully sick and thus your body can not handle anymore cigarettes. The cigarettes gave up on you before you gave up on them.
Song title: “Who Do You Think You Are?
Genre: Hip Hop/ R&B
Explanation: This song goes out to all those high school bullies. I am trying to put an end to all those insensitive kids who think they have to make fun of other kids to be cool. I use questions like “who do you think you are” to patronize these bullies and let them know how shallow and insecure they really are.
Song Title: “He’s in it To Win it”
Genre: Classical Rock
Explanation: This song is about Barak Obama. This song emphasizes the tremendous influence and dedication this man has to this nation and the world. I used phrases like “in it to win it” to let all those Barak bashers know that no matter how bad you make him look, Barak will find a way to redeem himself.
Song Title: “You Should’ve Thought Twice”
Genre: Hip Hop
Explanation: This song goes out to all the male and female infidels. I also stress the fact that in our society men are virtually allowed to do anything they want without worrying about being looked down upon. I put a hip hop beat to it so I can attract children to people in their late thirties. This song asserts thinking twice about engaging in such a shameful act.
Song Title: “Where is All the Money Going?”
Genre: Jazz
Explanation: This song elaborates on the fact that wealthy people are making so much money and the poorer are getting poorer. Why don’t people want to help out other people? If you have the money then why not indulge in the biggest pleasure in life which is giving? What are they doing with their money? I used a jazz melody to this song to create a more sympathetic tone.
Song Title: “ Build a Bridge and Get Over it”
Genre: Rock
Explanation: This song goes out to all the women in the world who are selling themselves cheap. Unfortunately women are forcing themselves to stay in pathetic relationships solely for the reason that they don’t think anyone else would ever be interested in them, and as a result they never want to end the relationship. This song revitalizes’ women’s whole perspective about how they view themselves and with rhetoric like “you are beautiful and deserve better” it gives them a boost of self confidence.
Song Title: “Environmental Friendly”
Genre: Smooth Jazz
Explanation: This song emphasizes the severe effects global warming will have on us in the future. This song has phrases like “turn off the sink”, “recycle your bottles”, and “you can make a change” to allow oneself to become proactive in regards to this catastrophe.
Song title: “Who Do You Think You Are?
Genre: Hip Hop/ R&B
Lyrics: Do what you want, say what you feel just know that I have no fear of you. You walk these halls like you own this place, sucker I got news for you, you aint nothing. I am not afraid of you but I cant help but to listen to what you say. Maybe I’m not good enough. Maybe you’re too good? No no, that can’t be it nobody even likes you. Why do you bully people? To gain popularity? Obviously that’s not working for you so I suggest you find another hobby.
CD COVER: it will have every color you can think of. Every dark, light, shaded, and gray tone to it to represent the variety of songs (issues) I talk about in my album. Also the color will catch the eye of most everyone, so that will encourage them to buy my album. There will be a question mark to represent all the enigmas in the world and then a finger pointing at the viewer just to make the viewer feel like they need to be more proactive.
Genre: Country
Explanation: This song elaborates on the obesity epidemic in our nation. The song comforts overweight people using phrases like “you are not alone” and “there is a way out.” The country tone of it will give the listeners a compassionate view on this topic and hopefully prevent bashers from being so cruel. The song will embed in listeners that there is a way out as long as you try to help yourself first.
Song title: “Quit it Before it Quits You”
Genre: Metal Rock
Explanation: This song emphasizes the importance of giving up smoking. The loud instruments and heavy metal echo will make this topic all the more serious. With rhetoric like “quit it before it quits you” I am trying to get the message across that if you do not quit smoking now, you will become awfully sick and thus your body can not handle anymore cigarettes. The cigarettes gave up on you before you gave up on them.
Song title: “Who Do You Think You Are?
Genre: Hip Hop/ R&B
Explanation: This song goes out to all those high school bullies. I am trying to put an end to all those insensitive kids who think they have to make fun of other kids to be cool. I use questions like “who do you think you are” to patronize these bullies and let them know how shallow and insecure they really are.
Song Title: “He’s in it To Win it”
Genre: Classical Rock
Explanation: This song is about Barak Obama. This song emphasizes the tremendous influence and dedication this man has to this nation and the world. I used phrases like “in it to win it” to let all those Barak bashers know that no matter how bad you make him look, Barak will find a way to redeem himself.
Song Title: “You Should’ve Thought Twice”
Genre: Hip Hop
Explanation: This song goes out to all the male and female infidels. I also stress the fact that in our society men are virtually allowed to do anything they want without worrying about being looked down upon. I put a hip hop beat to it so I can attract children to people in their late thirties. This song asserts thinking twice about engaging in such a shameful act.
Song Title: “Where is All the Money Going?”
Genre: Jazz
Explanation: This song elaborates on the fact that wealthy people are making so much money and the poorer are getting poorer. Why don’t people want to help out other people? If you have the money then why not indulge in the biggest pleasure in life which is giving? What are they doing with their money? I used a jazz melody to this song to create a more sympathetic tone.
Song Title: “ Build a Bridge and Get Over it”
Genre: Rock
Explanation: This song goes out to all the women in the world who are selling themselves cheap. Unfortunately women are forcing themselves to stay in pathetic relationships solely for the reason that they don’t think anyone else would ever be interested in them, and as a result they never want to end the relationship. This song revitalizes’ women’s whole perspective about how they view themselves and with rhetoric like “you are beautiful and deserve better” it gives them a boost of self confidence.
Song Title: “Environmental Friendly”
Genre: Smooth Jazz
Explanation: This song emphasizes the severe effects global warming will have on us in the future. This song has phrases like “turn off the sink”, “recycle your bottles”, and “you can make a change” to allow oneself to become proactive in regards to this catastrophe.
Song title: “Who Do You Think You Are?
Genre: Hip Hop/ R&B
Lyrics: Do what you want, say what you feel just know that I have no fear of you. You walk these halls like you own this place, sucker I got news for you, you aint nothing. I am not afraid of you but I cant help but to listen to what you say. Maybe I’m not good enough. Maybe you’re too good? No no, that can’t be it nobody even likes you. Why do you bully people? To gain popularity? Obviously that’s not working for you so I suggest you find another hobby.
CD COVER: it will have every color you can think of. Every dark, light, shaded, and gray tone to it to represent the variety of songs (issues) I talk about in my album. Also the color will catch the eye of most everyone, so that will encourage them to buy my album. There will be a question mark to represent all the enigmas in the world and then a finger pointing at the viewer just to make the viewer feel like they need to be more proactive.
Thursday, March 6, 2008
Tisk Tisk Tisk
1. After considering the arguments, how do you respond to the visual rhetoric of this shirt? Is there a middle ground? How does your exposure, participation, or lack of participation in a spiritual faith influence your decision?
I can’t believe that advertisement has come to a point where they have completely lost their sense of decency. Wearing a T-shirt that has a mockery of the real image of Jesus and calling him “my homeboy” is not only enormously disrespectful, but it is degrading to all religions. It is as if Jesus is your buddy and you go to the club with him on weekdays and get drunk. That is how preposterous the saying “my homeboy” is. I , like Mitchell, believe there is absolutely no middle ground. You do not wear or advertise your piety and deity. One’s religious faith and connection with God is something so sacred and is not to be mad light of. I come from such a religious family that has taught me to give others the respect that I would want. If this is Jesus, whether you believe in him as the son of God (as Christians do) or the Prophet of God (as the Muslims and Jews do) you do not use his name or even image in vain.
2. Use one of Mitchell's quotes to refute his argument.
Mitchell disgracefully said, “Sadly, I even know Christians who wear them.” which means that even some Christians themselves find this T-Shirt rather effective. What kind of message would this shirt be sending out? That we know Jesus and have connections with him to finagle our way into heaven? Come on now, by no means is Jesus anyone’s “homeboy”.
3. If the t-shirt only contained the text, would the impact be less controversial or less persuasive? How would the rhetoric be influenced if the shaded "bubble" letters in this shirt were changed to Gothic lettering?
If the t-shirt only contained the text the impact would be less controversial because it is not as disrespectful and commercial. Without the text the shirt would still be comical but not as degrading If the bubble letters in the shirt were changed to Gothic lettering it wouldn’t make that much of a difference because the statement “Jesus is my homeboy” is where we encounter a problem
4. How would you interpret the image's role in the rhetoric of this t-shirt? Do you see the image as a parody? Consider the way Jesus is depicted, including the halo, facial expression , and his positioning in relationship to the text in your response.
It is too much of a slang and informal phrase that should never be directed or even about someone of Jesus’ spiritual level. I see the image as a parody solely because if a person is wearing a shirt with JESUS on it, could you imagine going into a stall of a bathroom and walking out with Jesus on your shirt? It is just as disgusting when someone doesn’t wash their hands after they use the restroom. Jesus was depicted as some “fella” or some ordinary person that you can “kick it” with. There is zero respect and zero propriety.
5. Would the black t-shirt connote something different than a yellow one with the same text and image? Explain.
No it would not because the problem here is with the image, rhetoric, and text. I don’t think people are paying much attention to the background color although it would be much brighter and conspicuous if it were in yellow. The shirt would still be giving off the exact same impolite, degrading, and ludicrous message.
I can’t believe that advertisement has come to a point where they have completely lost their sense of decency. Wearing a T-shirt that has a mockery of the real image of Jesus and calling him “my homeboy” is not only enormously disrespectful, but it is degrading to all religions. It is as if Jesus is your buddy and you go to the club with him on weekdays and get drunk. That is how preposterous the saying “my homeboy” is. I , like Mitchell, believe there is absolutely no middle ground. You do not wear or advertise your piety and deity. One’s religious faith and connection with God is something so sacred and is not to be mad light of. I come from such a religious family that has taught me to give others the respect that I would want. If this is Jesus, whether you believe in him as the son of God (as Christians do) or the Prophet of God (as the Muslims and Jews do) you do not use his name or even image in vain.
2. Use one of Mitchell's quotes to refute his argument.
Mitchell disgracefully said, “Sadly, I even know Christians who wear them.” which means that even some Christians themselves find this T-Shirt rather effective. What kind of message would this shirt be sending out? That we know Jesus and have connections with him to finagle our way into heaven? Come on now, by no means is Jesus anyone’s “homeboy”.
3. If the t-shirt only contained the text, would the impact be less controversial or less persuasive? How would the rhetoric be influenced if the shaded "bubble" letters in this shirt were changed to Gothic lettering?
If the t-shirt only contained the text the impact would be less controversial because it is not as disrespectful and commercial. Without the text the shirt would still be comical but not as degrading If the bubble letters in the shirt were changed to Gothic lettering it wouldn’t make that much of a difference because the statement “Jesus is my homeboy” is where we encounter a problem
4. How would you interpret the image's role in the rhetoric of this t-shirt? Do you see the image as a parody? Consider the way Jesus is depicted, including the halo, facial expression , and his positioning in relationship to the text in your response.
It is too much of a slang and informal phrase that should never be directed or even about someone of Jesus’ spiritual level. I see the image as a parody solely because if a person is wearing a shirt with JESUS on it, could you imagine going into a stall of a bathroom and walking out with Jesus on your shirt? It is just as disgusting when someone doesn’t wash their hands after they use the restroom. Jesus was depicted as some “fella” or some ordinary person that you can “kick it” with. There is zero respect and zero propriety.
5. Would the black t-shirt connote something different than a yellow one with the same text and image? Explain.
No it would not because the problem here is with the image, rhetoric, and text. I don’t think people are paying much attention to the background color although it would be much brighter and conspicuous if it were in yellow. The shirt would still be giving off the exact same impolite, degrading, and ludicrous message.
Monday, March 3, 2008
Build a Bridge and Get Over it!
What are your initial reactions to Kelly's disqualification?
I was appalled not only because I too am Muslim and happen to wear the headscarf (or shall I say hood) as well, but because she is such an amazing runner and something so minor has hindered her dreams and goals. I thought the beauty of living in America was the diverse people and traditions. How come we can’t appreciate the fact that she is a devout Muslim and wears the head cover out of modesty?
2. What is your argument regarding the assertion that Kelly's disqualification constitutes religious discrimination? Does the disqualification of other athletes for non-religious reasons affect your response? If so, why or why not?
If the officials told Kelly to take her head cover off, that is sheer discrimination. Where in the rules does it say no head cover? And do these “rules” accommodate for the handicapped people who might be allergic to the sun so they must resort to hats and head covers? Do you think that there aren’t people like that? There are plenty. The disqualification of other athletes for non-religious reasons was not discrimination that was merely because the rule was only solid colors, but there was no rule that specifically said “no head covers”. If they would have told Kelly only solid colored head scarfs, she would have probably accommodated.
3. If you were to write an argumentative essay on this decision, what further information would you need to obtain to construct a more logos-based argument and counterargument?
I would like to know more about the dynamic of the rules. Also, if history shows that these rules are strictly abided by and implemented. I would also like to see if the athletes are well aware of these rules or if it was written in white ink on white paper on the contract that they signed prior to the race. I would also like to see if the rules accommodate religious and personal needs.
4. How effectively does Rogers defend his stance?
Not well at all. He gave the typical reasoning. He said “Every sport has uniform rules. It has nothing to do with religious discrimination. They were provided with several options that would have allowed her to run without taking off her head covering"”. What “several options” is Rogers talking about? Obviously if there we many other options that Kelly could resort to without taking off her headscarf, she would have.
5. What are some potential solutions to pursue regarding implementing track rules?
The officials need to take into consideration before setting thoughtless rules that infringed on religious and personal regulations. They should reformat their rules and regulations. They should embrace the diversity of this country along with the various religions by not making the uniforms too intricate.
6. If the single solid color rule was implemented so that judges could more easily distinguish the results of a close finish, would this change your response to Kelly's disqualification? Explain your answer.
It would in some aspects. The only aspect I am disputing is the fact that Kelly would have to remove her head scarf. Keeping the wardrobe a certain color to distinguish the results of a close finish sounds fair. If it helps determine a fair win then there is nothing wrong with that. As soon as it infringes on an individuals autonomy that is when it crosses the line.
I was appalled not only because I too am Muslim and happen to wear the headscarf (or shall I say hood) as well, but because she is such an amazing runner and something so minor has hindered her dreams and goals. I thought the beauty of living in America was the diverse people and traditions. How come we can’t appreciate the fact that she is a devout Muslim and wears the head cover out of modesty?
2. What is your argument regarding the assertion that Kelly's disqualification constitutes religious discrimination? Does the disqualification of other athletes for non-religious reasons affect your response? If so, why or why not?
If the officials told Kelly to take her head cover off, that is sheer discrimination. Where in the rules does it say no head cover? And do these “rules” accommodate for the handicapped people who might be allergic to the sun so they must resort to hats and head covers? Do you think that there aren’t people like that? There are plenty. The disqualification of other athletes for non-religious reasons was not discrimination that was merely because the rule was only solid colors, but there was no rule that specifically said “no head covers”. If they would have told Kelly only solid colored head scarfs, she would have probably accommodated.
3. If you were to write an argumentative essay on this decision, what further information would you need to obtain to construct a more logos-based argument and counterargument?
I would like to know more about the dynamic of the rules. Also, if history shows that these rules are strictly abided by and implemented. I would also like to see if the athletes are well aware of these rules or if it was written in white ink on white paper on the contract that they signed prior to the race. I would also like to see if the rules accommodate religious and personal needs.
4. How effectively does Rogers defend his stance?
Not well at all. He gave the typical reasoning. He said “Every sport has uniform rules. It has nothing to do with religious discrimination. They were provided with several options that would have allowed her to run without taking off her head covering"”. What “several options” is Rogers talking about? Obviously if there we many other options that Kelly could resort to without taking off her headscarf, she would have.
5. What are some potential solutions to pursue regarding implementing track rules?
The officials need to take into consideration before setting thoughtless rules that infringed on religious and personal regulations. They should reformat their rules and regulations. They should embrace the diversity of this country along with the various religions by not making the uniforms too intricate.
6. If the single solid color rule was implemented so that judges could more easily distinguish the results of a close finish, would this change your response to Kelly's disqualification? Explain your answer.
It would in some aspects. The only aspect I am disputing is the fact that Kelly would have to remove her head scarf. Keeping the wardrobe a certain color to distinguish the results of a close finish sounds fair. If it helps determine a fair win then there is nothing wrong with that. As soon as it infringes on an individuals autonomy that is when it crosses the line.
Wednesday, February 27, 2008
My turn to shine
Shark Lunch
1) “This is not Funny”
2) My audience would be everyone who is living of all ages, shapes, and sizes
3) Although the tone of the image was humorous, I would not make a joke about this. I would use a more pathos-based tone solely because could you imagine a more brutal death than to be viciously eaten up by so easily by sharks because of the effects of global warming?
4) The introduction style would be presenting an overview of what exactly global warming is, and what will happen if it perpetuates.
5) I would love for this article to be published in Times Magazine along with the Washington Post. That way this topic can’t escape anybody!
Greenhouse Effect
6) “Don’t think this wont happen because it will!”
7) Everyone in general
8) The tone would be logos-driven because the effects of greenhouse gases are real and many studies can back it up. You don’t even need studies to prove it, you can just look at a map of the world 60 years ago and now, and then you will believe.
9) The intro style would be in second-person pronoun (you) solely because I want people to read my article and really feel like they need to be the ones to make the change and stop depending on others to do it. If they keep depending on others to make the first move then there will be a stagnate situation because everyone depends on the other.
10) This is such a serious topic that I would love for my article to be published in public school text books and in college texts.
KEY AND FORK
the title would be “Believe it or Not”
my targeted audience would be the elderly crowd because I know they would be more concerned about their health and what surprises the future holds for their children.
the tone of my essay would be humorous only because who would of thought that what you eat can effect greenhouse gas emissions?? And by making light of that, people will never forget the SERIOUSNESS of this topic and walk away with a good laugh then quickly say “my god who would have thought”
I would first start off by defining all the terms I would be using like “greenhouse gas emissions” just to insure that my audience understands precisely what I am talking about. Then I would present an overview of the issue I’m discussing. I want to shed light upon how important this topic is and what could happen.
I would like my essay to appear in the New York Times because almost all elderly people read that.
1) “This is not Funny”
2) My audience would be everyone who is living of all ages, shapes, and sizes
3) Although the tone of the image was humorous, I would not make a joke about this. I would use a more pathos-based tone solely because could you imagine a more brutal death than to be viciously eaten up by so easily by sharks because of the effects of global warming?
4) The introduction style would be presenting an overview of what exactly global warming is, and what will happen if it perpetuates.
5) I would love for this article to be published in Times Magazine along with the Washington Post. That way this topic can’t escape anybody!
Greenhouse Effect
6) “Don’t think this wont happen because it will!”
7) Everyone in general
8) The tone would be logos-driven because the effects of greenhouse gases are real and many studies can back it up. You don’t even need studies to prove it, you can just look at a map of the world 60 years ago and now, and then you will believe.
9) The intro style would be in second-person pronoun (you) solely because I want people to read my article and really feel like they need to be the ones to make the change and stop depending on others to do it. If they keep depending on others to make the first move then there will be a stagnate situation because everyone depends on the other.
10) This is such a serious topic that I would love for my article to be published in public school text books and in college texts.
KEY AND FORK
the title would be “Believe it or Not”
my targeted audience would be the elderly crowd because I know they would be more concerned about their health and what surprises the future holds for their children.
the tone of my essay would be humorous only because who would of thought that what you eat can effect greenhouse gas emissions?? And by making light of that, people will never forget the SERIOUSNESS of this topic and walk away with a good laugh then quickly say “my god who would have thought”
I would first start off by defining all the terms I would be using like “greenhouse gas emissions” just to insure that my audience understands precisely what I am talking about. Then I would present an overview of the issue I’m discussing. I want to shed light upon how important this topic is and what could happen.
I would like my essay to appear in the New York Times because almost all elderly people read that.
Monday, February 25, 2008
MOM PLEASE!!!
Dear Mother and Father,
You guys know that I am your biggest fan of all times. There is nothing in the world that I wouldn’t do for you guys, and I know there is nothing in the world that you wouldn’t do for me. That is why I am respectively asking you to consider buying me a Toyota Prius. Just think about how much we would all benefit from getting me this car. I would never be late going to school or commuting anywhere because I could easily hop on the HOV lane without any other passengers in the car besides myself. Not only that, but I would be saving you tons of money on fuel because the Toyota Prius gets 100 miles per gallon. Also, you wouldn’t have to worry about my safety as much because Toyotas are the leading car manufacturer for quality in the world. Toyotas are so convenient they come is all shapes and sizes. They can be roomy yet compact and safe at the same time -(logos)-answers.com-(ethos). Mom I promise you that I will get the weekly groceries, pick up my brothers and sisters from after school activities, and make it home by my curfew. I love you so much and would do anything to have a car that I can move around easily with.
Dear Hassanah Darling,
There was one thing that I agreed with in your letter of consideration which was that I love you very much and would do anything for you. However at this time I can not afford to buy you a car. You completely disregarded the fact that I have seven other children that are in college or need to be put through college. Toyota Priuses cost more than an average car. And since hybrids are a new technology you are prone to more safety hazards of newfound technology, and God knows what could happen. Also, not many mechanics can service the car because the car runs off of an electrical battery, so think of the amount of money it would cost me to fix a car like that. I’m sorry dear but I need to make ends meet not only for you but for the family as well. You say that you will pick up your brothers and sisters and do the grocery shopping, I can assure you that you’d only do it for a couple of weeks then stop. Do you know how I no? Because every one of your brothers and sisters told me the same thing and I fell for it, but not this time. As soon as you get a car you will be with your friends all the time and forget about the family or your family chores. Once you can prove to your father and I that you are worthy of a car then we will take it into consideration. Until then, focus on your school work and get better grades.
Dear Mom and Dad,
Although I highly respect your decision I entreat that you reconsider. You have no idea how serious I am about the promises that I will commit to if given the car. I will even make a deal with you. Once I get the car I will do the weekly grocery shopping and pick up Tom and Jerry from school. If I slack off you can take away my car for as long as you wish and make me go back to taking the bus everyday to school. Mom, I understand that you have a lot of expenses but how about if I worked to help you pay for the car, gas, and future mishaps? I am wholeheartedly willing to do so. I will not be out all the time and if you think I am then I will make a schedule for you so you will never have to worry about my whereabouts. I am even willing to share the car with you and whoever needs the car. Please take me seriously and reconsider. Your consideration is highly appreciated.
You guys know that I am your biggest fan of all times. There is nothing in the world that I wouldn’t do for you guys, and I know there is nothing in the world that you wouldn’t do for me. That is why I am respectively asking you to consider buying me a Toyota Prius. Just think about how much we would all benefit from getting me this car. I would never be late going to school or commuting anywhere because I could easily hop on the HOV lane without any other passengers in the car besides myself. Not only that, but I would be saving you tons of money on fuel because the Toyota Prius gets 100 miles per gallon. Also, you wouldn’t have to worry about my safety as much because Toyotas are the leading car manufacturer for quality in the world. Toyotas are so convenient they come is all shapes and sizes. They can be roomy yet compact and safe at the same time -(logos)-answers.com-(ethos). Mom I promise you that I will get the weekly groceries, pick up my brothers and sisters from after school activities, and make it home by my curfew. I love you so much and would do anything to have a car that I can move around easily with.
Dear Hassanah Darling,
There was one thing that I agreed with in your letter of consideration which was that I love you very much and would do anything for you. However at this time I can not afford to buy you a car. You completely disregarded the fact that I have seven other children that are in college or need to be put through college. Toyota Priuses cost more than an average car. And since hybrids are a new technology you are prone to more safety hazards of newfound technology, and God knows what could happen. Also, not many mechanics can service the car because the car runs off of an electrical battery, so think of the amount of money it would cost me to fix a car like that. I’m sorry dear but I need to make ends meet not only for you but for the family as well. You say that you will pick up your brothers and sisters and do the grocery shopping, I can assure you that you’d only do it for a couple of weeks then stop. Do you know how I no? Because every one of your brothers and sisters told me the same thing and I fell for it, but not this time. As soon as you get a car you will be with your friends all the time and forget about the family or your family chores. Once you can prove to your father and I that you are worthy of a car then we will take it into consideration. Until then, focus on your school work and get better grades.
Dear Mom and Dad,
Although I highly respect your decision I entreat that you reconsider. You have no idea how serious I am about the promises that I will commit to if given the car. I will even make a deal with you. Once I get the car I will do the weekly grocery shopping and pick up Tom and Jerry from school. If I slack off you can take away my car for as long as you wish and make me go back to taking the bus everyday to school. Mom, I understand that you have a lot of expenses but how about if I worked to help you pay for the car, gas, and future mishaps? I am wholeheartedly willing to do so. I will not be out all the time and if you think I am then I will make a schedule for you so you will never have to worry about my whereabouts. I am even willing to share the car with you and whoever needs the car. Please take me seriously and reconsider. Your consideration is highly appreciated.
Wednesday, February 20, 2008
Go Figure
This photo won Eddie Adams the 1969 Pulitzer Prize. It represents the reality of the Vietnam War. One glimpse at the photo and one would instantaneously infer that that Nguyen Van Lam (Bay Lap) was the victim here and Loan was the malicious, brutal, and ruthless colonel. In reality Van Lam was the main man behind the killings of many other men and was deserving of what happened to him as cruel as that sounds. Adam realized that this picture doesn’t due justice to Loan and Adam himself said that “photographs do lie, even without manipulation. They are only half-truths” and that is precisely what happened. This photo started to change American public's views on their involvement in the Vietnam War."
Those protesting the Vietnam War
This photograph should be the cover of a magazine to shed light to the truth behind the brutality of the Vietnam War. No matter what the victim did, who has the right to cease a persons life without digging down to core of what really occurred? Where is this victim’s human right? Where is the executer’s sanity?
The US government in support of the Vietnam War
This photo should not be shown in order to maintain the competency of the US government and their erroneous judgment. If this photo is released the citizens will develop a mistrust in their government and that will lead to a lack of trust and hope in the way they govern.
Eddie Adams in 1969
This photo should be posted. This shows the enigmatic side of photography and how, within the stillness of a moment, an image could be interpreted in various ways. Adams is passionate about capturing life and putting real and grave scenarios into perspective. Although some photos may lure be misinterpreted, ultimately they are eye openers and mind boggling.
Nyugen Ngoc Loan (man doing the execution)
This photo should not be published to save Loan face. It’s not fair that he isn’t allowed to verbally speak in this photograph because his action leaves the viewer despising him. This photo brings disgrace to Loan and his family, something I’m sure a photographer wouldn’t think of until after its been publicized.
Nguyen Van Lam's widow (widow of the man being executed)
This photo should not be published because no matter what is going on in the photo, the fact that her husband is deceased earns him right to rest in peace and not have his family worry and deal with the aftermath and controversy that such a photo would cause. For heaven sake this woman’s husband was just shot in the head, she already has to deal with the anguish, pain, and sorrow and on top of that she would have to deal with a lifetime of speculation.
A publisher who must decide if this picture should appear in a fifth grade history book (assume that the photo has now appeared in the newspaper and has won the Pulitzer Prize)
This picture should not appear in a fifth grade history book let alone any elementary or middle school history book. Children have a propensity to emulate a lot of the things that they see on TV, videogames, comic books, and etc. Perhaps a child would see that picture and think that such acts are permissible and want to try it sometime himself. This is not the type of controversy we want our children getting into.
Those protesting the Vietnam War
This photograph should be the cover of a magazine to shed light to the truth behind the brutality of the Vietnam War. No matter what the victim did, who has the right to cease a persons life without digging down to core of what really occurred? Where is this victim’s human right? Where is the executer’s sanity?
The US government in support of the Vietnam War
This photo should not be shown in order to maintain the competency of the US government and their erroneous judgment. If this photo is released the citizens will develop a mistrust in their government and that will lead to a lack of trust and hope in the way they govern.
Eddie Adams in 1969
This photo should be posted. This shows the enigmatic side of photography and how, within the stillness of a moment, an image could be interpreted in various ways. Adams is passionate about capturing life and putting real and grave scenarios into perspective. Although some photos may lure be misinterpreted, ultimately they are eye openers and mind boggling.
Nyugen Ngoc Loan (man doing the execution)
This photo should not be published to save Loan face. It’s not fair that he isn’t allowed to verbally speak in this photograph because his action leaves the viewer despising him. This photo brings disgrace to Loan and his family, something I’m sure a photographer wouldn’t think of until after its been publicized.
Nguyen Van Lam's widow (widow of the man being executed)
This photo should not be published because no matter what is going on in the photo, the fact that her husband is deceased earns him right to rest in peace and not have his family worry and deal with the aftermath and controversy that such a photo would cause. For heaven sake this woman’s husband was just shot in the head, she already has to deal with the anguish, pain, and sorrow and on top of that she would have to deal with a lifetime of speculation.
A publisher who must decide if this picture should appear in a fifth grade history book (assume that the photo has now appeared in the newspaper and has won the Pulitzer Prize)
This picture should not appear in a fifth grade history book let alone any elementary or middle school history book. Children have a propensity to emulate a lot of the things that they see on TV, videogames, comic books, and etc. Perhaps a child would see that picture and think that such acts are permissible and want to try it sometime himself. This is not the type of controversy we want our children getting into.
Monday, February 18, 2008
It's Just NOT fair!!
That is so sad. I chose the picture of the pregnant women leaning on the coffin. The fact that Heisler doesn’t even show her face is brilliant because without seeing her face you can still feel the same sorrow, anguish, and compassion that the women herself is feeling. You can tell by the way her head is tilted downward and her hands are touching her unborn son. It is almost as if she is trying to tell her deceased husband “listen to the baby’s heart beat, look what and who you are leaving behind.” If you look closely you can tell that Heisler blurred out the soldier in the back ground, which is considerate of the photographer to keep the main focus on the widowed soon to be mother. For once the attention can be given to the real victims of this war.
The argument that I would entertain would be that it is not fair that troops leave their pregnant wives with a colossal risk of them losing their lives and leaving an unborn child behind. It is just not fair. Who will provide for the pregnant widow in the photo? Who will take care of these widowed wives awaiting their deceased husband’s arrival? I am using the pathos approach so I can touch the people’s hearts. I want people to really comprehend or really genuinely feel for these women. Their husbands are/were attempting to pursue “patriotic” acts and as a result lost their lives, but what does that leave for these deceased soldiers’ families?
The argument that I would entertain would be that it is not fair that troops leave their pregnant wives with a colossal risk of them losing their lives and leaving an unborn child behind. It is just not fair. Who will provide for the pregnant widow in the photo? Who will take care of these widowed wives awaiting their deceased husband’s arrival? I am using the pathos approach so I can touch the people’s hearts. I want people to really comprehend or really genuinely feel for these women. Their husbands are/were attempting to pursue “patriotic” acts and as a result lost their lives, but what does that leave for these deceased soldiers’ families?
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
Come on now let's be fair!
It’s weird because before knowing a lot about steroids I was completely against it, but after watching that video and reading the articles I’m not AS against it as I use to be. Lets be honest, yes it is not fair that some athletes resort to performance enhancing drugs because it keeps them ahead of the game illegally, but how bout all the other men who have been using it “responsibly” and have seen absolutely ZERO side effects from it? If you ask me, forty years of steroids without any side effects at all seems pretty legit. I absolutely don’t agree with professional athletes or high school athletes using the drugs unless there was a strict rule implementing that everyone would be allowed to use only a certain amount of steroids and that’s that’s. Ideologically that will never happen; someone is bound to break that rule, its human nature. There is no difference between professional athletes using the drug and high school athletes using it as well. After all, how did our professional athletes start their career? If not all of them then most of them started in high school and were either drafted into the NFL/NBA and etcetera or worked their way to it. Different steroid use standards for different sports are absurd because we all know that there will be cheating and misleading. The video fails to address any long term studies done on people who use steroids and the side effects. Most of the instances they provided were positive effects. Ultimately any none athlete would know how to use steroids responsibly, but other than that it is just not fair to professional athletes and high school athletes.
Tuesday, February 12, 2008
G.I joke?
It is obvious that these two articles are contrary to each other. The first article, Evolving Ideals of Male Body Image as Seen Through Action Toys, is promoting the idea that children are virtually influenced by the conspicuous growth of the muscular male physique through action figures. The authors of this article aren’t necessarily saying that these men are becoming anorexic but “the prevalence of body dissatisfaction is striking”. If we take closes look at GI Joe, Star Wars, Superman, Spiderman, and Batman, we can conclude that over the years there has been a vast alteration in their body sizes and muscular physique. The authors explain that “not only have the figures grown more muscular, but they have developed increasingly sharp muscular definition through the years”. This applies also to women through Playboy magazines and beauty pageants. Over the years these women have become smaller and smaller and thinner and thinner. It’s not going to get any better. This article suggests that one someone grows attached to their idols, whatever or whoever it may be, seeing the image they are portraying will have even the slightest bit of effect on its idolizers.
The second article, G.I Joe’s Big Biceps are Not a Big Deal, suggests that not only do these action figures have no impact on anyone, but it would be considered imbecilic to believe it could have any impact on someone. Through her use of language she makes you feel like an idiot if you really believed that these action figures are altering everyone’s images; “but a plastic doll? Please.” “will this foolishness ever stop?” She suggests that kids can be influenced by REAL people like Mark McGwire and Bill Romanowski and their magnificent muscular, rather intimidating, physique.
Ultimately anything that the media has to offer will trigger, even the slightest bit, of “hmm why don’t I look like that?” especially for women. We look at those BEAUTIFUL celebrities and models on the runway and think “my god I hate her for being so beautiful” then engage in some sort of eating disorder. Although I do not think that action figures have such a massive impact on young children, I can completely understand where the authors would come up with a notion like that. I have five brothers and when they reminisce about those action figures that they use to play with, never have they brought up the idea that they were traumatized by them or intimidated by them. However it is so clear that just like the media pursues excessively thin model bodies and exaggeratedly muscular men, that it has found its way to the action figures. GO FIGURES
Saturday, February 9, 2008
Army Leads Young People to The Path of War
It is very clear that the army is desensitizing the young people into loving war and violence. The rhetoric and the visuals displayed on the website were attempts to intrigue and invite viewers to enjoy participating and watching war activities. Many studies have shown that these types of violent games desensitize the players against having or showing any sentiments of care or concern for the human element involved in the violence. The army wants to capitalize on these violent game players and redirect their aggressions toward real live war games in the army. Many studies prove that the average video game player is between the age of 11 and 34; which is exactly the audience that the army wants to recruit.The video game does not have to directly promote violence, but it does leave the player with less of an open heart. My brothers are addicted to "Haylow", and my mother has band that game from the house. Ever since she noticed that the key to the game was to try and kill everyone around you, she couldn't believe that people could actually get a thrill out of that. She was right! All you could hear in the background was "AAAH" "GUN SHOT GUN SHOT" and other disturbing sounds that gave me nightmares, but unfortunately this has become the norm. These types of games have enabled video game players to feel little or no remorse in the sense that they could witness a man being shot right in front of them and not get the shivers. So it's a contradiction to promote peace and diplomacy while at the same time enculturation a whole new generation to be insensitive to violent manslaughter. The army is not so much indoctrinating the ideology of war as it is capitalizing on a new young generation that has already been desensitized to the inhumanity of war and are ready bait to be sucked in to the national war machine.
Running Running Running, Marsha MArsha MArshaa
Wait, I am still laughing. I loved the way there is a clear and distinct difference between runners and joggers. Pearl Izumi obviously leads the reader in becoming a runner because runners solve crimes. Runners are acutely aware of their surroundings. Runners are cool. Runners are portrayed as heroes. Runners, runners, and runners; reminds me of “Marsha Marsha Marsha” from the Brady Bunch and I LOVE it. Pearl Lzumi is ingenious; she shoes you the significance of running through the intelligence and motives of runners. In her efforts of persuasion, she indirectly ridicules joggers for “stopping for a snow cone if the fancy strikes them” because what was the point of the workout if you instantly and effortlessly gain all the calories back? She has convinced me that joggers are inferior to runners and runners shall always prevail in everything. I myself was a jogger, but after reading this ad I have converted to running. The text obviously alludes to pathos because I, a former jogger, am ashamed that I didn’t take it to the next level and be a runner! After readying the ad I feel as if joggers are incompetent, and one should strive to be a runner so they can reap all the benefits that come with being a runner.The Rbk ad was just disturbing. My god, I don’t even want to remember the add let alone by the shoes. What kind of message would you be sending to people by showing a man vomiting on the floor, even though you are trying to get across the opposite of what is portrayed? I think the mind behind the first add would destroy the second ad in comparison. The first ad was clever, witty, and funny. I was inspired to become a runner. The second ad was weird, disturbing, and deterred me from the whole concept of working out.
ProCon Ana?
ProCon Ana?
I am appalled that a website like Pro-ana would even be allowed in the US and was dumbfounded by its rapid popularity. Allowing a website that enables oneself to express desperate emotions and thoughts like “the thinner, the winner”, and “you can never be too rich or too thin” will promote whatever “secret” or message they are trying to conceal. When I read that this website also “invites people who aspire to having eating disorders” to come and express how they feel, I was in utter shock. This website is the antithesis of what kind of message we want our children to perceive. We want our children to feel beautiful in their own shoes, not constantly yearn to mimic the bogus images they see on TV. We want a community who is willing to seek help for their disorders, not flaunt their naiveness and possibly encouraging others to be and do the same.When I think about the courage Claire had, to be the brains behind such a website, a website that enables bulimic and anorexic persons to vent, I couldn’t help but to sympathize with her. She must have really hit her breaking point trying to cope with her disorders before she made “pro-ana”. Clair knew she wasn’t alone. That’s why the website recruited nearly a thousand members within the two-week sign up period. With usernames like “Wannabeboney”, “Neverthinenuf”, and “afraidtolookinthemirrow”, it was obvious that all of the members of the site have one thing in common; they are all discontent with their image and turn to anorexia, bulimia, or both as a remedy. These “disturbed” people have nobody to turn to. They don’t want to go to the doctor because doctors won’t advocate it, and their friends and families “just don’t understand”. Pro-ana is the only source of comfort these helpless people have to turn to where nobody can judge them and, if they want, they can withhold their true identity. Claire clearly states that “this is a website, a place where people who have only their eating disorders can congregate, along with the people who aspire to having eating disorder”. If these people are so diligently unwilling to get help, why would we take away their only savior? Although I have great compassion for the members of the Pro-Ana website, I do think they should seek help, or at least accept it when given the opportunity. Understanding the fact that these people have nobody to turn to, they should be allowed to vent on the website as long as they try to recover. I do not by any means think Pro-ana should be allowed if all the members do is talk about their distress and leave it at that. If someone wants to tell their story it must have a beneficial ending in effort to benefit readers. For example, you can talk about how you are/were discontent with your image and resorted to anorexia/bulimia, but gradually you got help and you are recovering. Also, the website should provide immediate and legitimate contact information for people seeking help. This way anyone who is on the verge of becoming anorexic or bulimic will be inspired to get better and live a healthy life.
I am appalled that a website like Pro-ana would even be allowed in the US and was dumbfounded by its rapid popularity. Allowing a website that enables oneself to express desperate emotions and thoughts like “the thinner, the winner”, and “you can never be too rich or too thin” will promote whatever “secret” or message they are trying to conceal. When I read that this website also “invites people who aspire to having eating disorders” to come and express how they feel, I was in utter shock. This website is the antithesis of what kind of message we want our children to perceive. We want our children to feel beautiful in their own shoes, not constantly yearn to mimic the bogus images they see on TV. We want a community who is willing to seek help for their disorders, not flaunt their naiveness and possibly encouraging others to be and do the same.When I think about the courage Claire had, to be the brains behind such a website, a website that enables bulimic and anorexic persons to vent, I couldn’t help but to sympathize with her. She must have really hit her breaking point trying to cope with her disorders before she made “pro-ana”. Clair knew she wasn’t alone. That’s why the website recruited nearly a thousand members within the two-week sign up period. With usernames like “Wannabeboney”, “Neverthinenuf”, and “afraidtolookinthemirrow”, it was obvious that all of the members of the site have one thing in common; they are all discontent with their image and turn to anorexia, bulimia, or both as a remedy. These “disturbed” people have nobody to turn to. They don’t want to go to the doctor because doctors won’t advocate it, and their friends and families “just don’t understand”. Pro-ana is the only source of comfort these helpless people have to turn to where nobody can judge them and, if they want, they can withhold their true identity. Claire clearly states that “this is a website, a place where people who have only their eating disorders can congregate, along with the people who aspire to having eating disorder”. If these people are so diligently unwilling to get help, why would we take away their only savior? Although I have great compassion for the members of the Pro-Ana website, I do think they should seek help, or at least accept it when given the opportunity. Understanding the fact that these people have nobody to turn to, they should be allowed to vent on the website as long as they try to recover. I do not by any means think Pro-ana should be allowed if all the members do is talk about their distress and leave it at that. If someone wants to tell their story it must have a beneficial ending in effort to benefit readers. For example, you can talk about how you are/were discontent with your image and resorted to anorexia/bulimia, but gradually you got help and you are recovering. Also, the website should provide immediate and legitimate contact information for people seeking help. This way anyone who is on the verge of becoming anorexic or bulimic will be inspired to get better and live a healthy life.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)